http://jnuk.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] jnuk.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] profpr 2010-06-15 01:25 pm (UTC)

Удивительно неправильный подход и соответстенно неверные выводы: "For the purposes of this paper, the rate of innovation is defined as the number of important technological developments per year divided by the world population.....The number of technology events per year comes from a list of 8583 important events in the history of science and technology compiled by Bunch and Hellemans [1]. Only the most recent 7198 events since the Dark Ages are used for the analysis presented in this paper."

А почему бы тогда не взять патентную статистику. На мой взгляд это было бы более правильной мерой.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting