Журналисты... 2
Feb. 15th, 2010 03:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
profprСтатья в Times (Заголовок остался прежним на перепечатке Fox News)
U.N. Climate Panel Shamed By Bogus Rainforest Claim
A startling report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.
Первый автор статьи в Nature отвечает журналисту: Они не процитировали моих более поздних работ, на самом деле, все еще хуже.
The IPCC statement on the Amazon is correct, but the citations listed in the Rowell and Moore report were incomplete... After the Rowell and Moore report was released in 2000, and prior to the publication of the IPCC AR4, new evidence of the full extent of severe drought in the Amazon was available. In 2004, we estimated that half of the forest area of the Amazon Basin had either fallen below, or was very close to, the critical level of soil moisture below which trees begin to die in 1998. This estimate incorporated new rainfall data and results from an experimental reduction of rainfall in an Amazon forest that we had conducted with funding from the US National Science Foundation (Nepstad et al. 2004). Field evidence of the soil moisture critical threshold is presented in Nepstad et al. 2007.
Журналист исправляет свою статью:
The UN climate panel and the rainforest claim
A STARTLING report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise...
U.N. Climate Panel Shamed By Bogus Rainforest Claim
A startling report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.
Первый автор статьи в Nature отвечает журналисту: Они не процитировали моих более поздних работ, на самом деле, все еще хуже.
The IPCC statement on the Amazon is correct, but the citations listed in the Rowell and Moore report were incomplete... After the Rowell and Moore report was released in 2000, and prior to the publication of the IPCC AR4, new evidence of the full extent of severe drought in the Amazon was available. In 2004, we estimated that half of the forest area of the Amazon Basin had either fallen below, or was very close to, the critical level of soil moisture below which trees begin to die in 1998. This estimate incorporated new rainfall data and results from an experimental reduction of rainfall in an Amazon forest that we had conducted with funding from the US National Science Foundation (Nepstad et al. 2004). Field evidence of the soil moisture critical threshold is presented in Nepstad et al. 2007.
Журналист исправляет свою статью:
The UN climate panel and the rainforest claim
A STARTLING report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise...
