![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
А теперь и климатскептик-гейт
Feb. 15th, 2012 02:48 pmТеперь украли документы из Heartland Institute. Ирония здесь в том, что два года назад, во время кражи электронной почты университета Восточной Англии, Heartland Institute раздувал скандал вокруг "заговора климатологов", так что создается столь любимая американским народом ситуация "вор у вора шапку украл".
Лично меня очень позабавил их план на текущий год: "глушить" выступления известных климатологов в прессе и "культивировать" Андрю Ревкина из Нью Йорк Таймс.
Heartland plays an important role in climate communications, especially through our in-house experts (e.g., Taylor) through his Forbes blog and related high profile outlets, our conferences, and through coordination with external networks (such as WUWT and other groups capable of rapidly mobilizing responses to new scientific findings, news stories, or unfavorable blog posts).
Efforts at places such as Forbes are especially important now that they have begun to allow highprofile climate scientists (such as Gleick) to post warmist science essays that counter our own. This influential audience has usually been reliably anti-climate and it is important to keep opposing voices out. Efforts might also include cultivating more neutral voices with big audiences (such as Revkin at DotEarth/NYTimes, who has a well-known antipathy for some of the more extreme AGW communicators such as Rornm, Trenberth, and Hansen) or Curry (who has become popular with our supporters). We have also pledged to help raise around $90,000 in 2012 for Anthony Watts to help him create a new website to track temperature station data.
Лично меня очень позабавил их план на текущий год: "глушить" выступления известных климатологов в прессе и "культивировать" Андрю Ревкина из Нью Йорк Таймс.
Heartland plays an important role in climate communications, especially through our in-house experts (e.g., Taylor) through his Forbes blog and related high profile outlets, our conferences, and through coordination with external networks (such as WUWT and other groups capable of rapidly mobilizing responses to new scientific findings, news stories, or unfavorable blog posts).
Efforts at places such as Forbes are especially important now that they have begun to allow highprofile climate scientists (such as Gleick) to post warmist science essays that counter our own. This influential audience has usually been reliably anti-climate and it is important to keep opposing voices out. Efforts might also include cultivating more neutral voices with big audiences (such as Revkin at DotEarth/NYTimes, who has a well-known antipathy for some of the more extreme AGW communicators such as Rornm, Trenberth, and Hansen) or Curry (who has become popular with our supporters). We have also pledged to help raise around $90,000 in 2012 for Anthony Watts to help him create a new website to track temperature station data.
