Про шашечки или ехать
May. 27th, 2013 11:55 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
profprКак пишут, 53% республиканцев готово оплатить надбавку к товарам за выделенный углекислый газ, если эта надбавка названа "углеродным возмещением" (carbon offset). Если ту же самую надбавку назвать "углеродным налогом" (carbon tax), то оплатить ее готово только 13% республиканцев. Среди демократов разницы в ответах практически нет (56% vs. 53%).
Я не думаю, что тут имеет место некая корреляция политических воззрений человека и восприимчивости к словесному оформлению политических решений (framing). Хотя не могу не отметить явной иррациональности в ответах республиканцев: предполагается, что "a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" для убежденного рыночника.
"Participants subsequently were presented with four pairs of product decisions (i.e., gasoline, airline flights, electricity providers, and computers) that provided them with the identical product or service at two price levels: a cheaper one and a more expensive one, which included a carbon tax (or offset). We used current market prices for the products and determined the price of the tax or offset by averaging the estimates of several on-line carbon-offset providers. For example, one product pair was a round-trip flight from New York to Los Angeles for $345 or the same flight for $352, including a carbon tax (or offset). For each product pair, participants indicated their preferred option (dichotomous choice), how strongly they preferred each option (on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly prefer A, −2, to strongly prefer B, 2), and whether they believed the carbon offset (or tax) should be made mandatory for all products of that type (on a 7-point scale ranging from definitely not, –3, to definitely, 3)."
Я не думаю, что тут имеет место некая корреляция политических воззрений человека и восприимчивости к словесному оформлению политических решений (framing). Хотя не могу не отметить явной иррациональности в ответах республиканцев: предполагается, что "a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" для убежденного рыночника.
"Participants subsequently were presented with four pairs of product decisions (i.e., gasoline, airline flights, electricity providers, and computers) that provided them with the identical product or service at two price levels: a cheaper one and a more expensive one, which included a carbon tax (or offset). We used current market prices for the products and determined the price of the tax or offset by averaging the estimates of several on-line carbon-offset providers. For example, one product pair was a round-trip flight from New York to Los Angeles for $345 or the same flight for $352, including a carbon tax (or offset). For each product pair, participants indicated their preferred option (dichotomous choice), how strongly they preferred each option (on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly prefer A, −2, to strongly prefer B, 2), and whether they believed the carbon offset (or tax) should be made mandatory for all products of that type (on a 7-point scale ranging from definitely not, –3, to definitely, 3)."
